Police promised by city council in return for Measure Y taxes:
|
802
|
|
Police officers employed June 28, 2010:
|
775
|
Mayor Dellums claimed a total of 837 police on Nov. 14, 2008. After raiding the Measure Y parcel tax receipts for a hiring drive (subsequently ruled illegal by a judge), Dellums showed the maneuver was mere political show. He canceled a training academy scheduled to begin in December 2008, withdrawing job offers to more than 40 recruits.
Dellums bluntly said police officer staffing will decline below his 803 target by summer 2009. Indeed it did, now fewer than the number promised for Measure Y taxes.
In addition, City Hall has already eliminated 36 non-officer positions in the police department – dispatchers, crime report specialists, evidence technicians, etc. There are also 55 budgeted but unfilled positions, such as criminalists.
Oakland needs at least 1,100 police officers
|
Oakland – a city plagued by homicides, armed robberies, auto theft and vandalism, as well as continual disruption from boom cars, sideshows, and groups of street dealers – has half a police department, compared to most major cities. The following chart shows the number of police officers per 10,000 residents. You'll find Oakland at the bottom of the list.
|
KRON TV talks to ORPN on police shortage (Click image for 2 min. .WMV video)
|
|
Source for other cities: U.S. Dept. of Justice at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/csllea04.htm. Oakland calculated from 740 officers for 410,000 residents. Figures are from 2004, but some cities, especially Los Angeles, are now in the middle of multiyear projects to add more police after several years of moderate decline.
Are most other cities wasting money on a police force twice the size they need? We don't think so. Oakland has the problem. The city simply does not have enough police to maintain public safety. That's why Oakland ranks as the fourth most dangerous city in the country. That's why a culture of disruption and disrespect dominates our neighborhoods.
How does Oakland compare with other California cities? San Francisco has 60 percent more officers. Los Angeles has one-third more police officers per population than Oakland.
Most shocking of all, if we calculate the number of violent crimes that each officer has to deal with on average, Oakland is at the top of the list for California's ten largest cities by a huge margin.
| City | Violent crimes per sworn FTE | Poverty rate (%) |
| Oakland | 7.6 | 19 |
| Los Angeles | 4.8 | 22 |
| Fresno | 4.5 | 26 |
| Santa Ana | 4.5 | 20 |
| Sacramento | 4.4 | 20 |
| Long Beach | 3.7 | 23 |
| San Diego | 3.5 | 15 |
| Anaheim | 3.5 | 14 |
| San Francisco | 2.6 | 11 |
| San Jose | 2.5 | 6 |
See chart
Source: Oakland Police Department Overtime Assessment, April 17, 2005, commissioned by Oakland City Council, pages 8, 10. Figures are for 2003.
What a list for Oakland to be number one! Partly, it is because the city has so much violent crime; partly it is because Oakland police are so severely understaffed.
Notice, too, that Oakland's ostrich crowd (the leaders who ignore our crisis in public safety while prattling forever about social programs) cannot say that poverty is the root cause of our problem. Oakland is in the middle of the list as far as poverty goes, but far above all the other cities for violent crimes laid on each police officer.
|